Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Public Schools Offer Flexibility, Choice


By Margaret Arbuckle
Executive Director, Guilford Education Alliance

Free public education that is available to all students is one of the magnificent civil rights of our country. Our society’s commitment to provide this opportunity, built on principles of democracy and what is best for the common good, is the foundation for our economic prosperity and our civil society.

For generations, education was provided through a standardized curriculum that all were expected to achieve. But thankfully, throughout the decades, public education has evolved to meet the needs of individual students and the larger needs of our society as we have moved from agrarian to manufacturing to a knowledge-based economy, and as our citizens have become more diverse.


Today’s public school classrooms do not resemble those of our parents. The commitment to education for all has strengthened. The underpinning is the development of a system that provides a flexible means of providing appropriate education to all, overseen by a State Board of Education appointed by the governor and the legislature and locally by an elected Board of Education.

There are many examples of the system’s flexibility, but it is best exemplified through the changing structures of our schools, from initially a standardized curriculum through 12 grades, to evolving to include: early childhood education, kindergarten and now pre-K; multiple choices within the K-12 framework, such as magnet schools and alternative schools; large traditional high schools and middle colleges and early colleges (small high schools with focused curricula) that connect their students with higher education through community college enrollment or traditional university/college coursework; and schools using the Internet to present coursework.

Over time, we have expanded our system to include charter schools that were conceived to create innovative education practices that could be transmitted to traditional school settings. These schools are publicly funded, approved by the State Board of Education, but managed by a nonprofit board of directors (which may contract with a for-profit administrative company) and are exempt from the same operational standards as traditional schools. Charter schools are part of the evolving system of education.

Until now, the focus of the evolving system has been to continue to meet the needs of the common good, the commitment that all of us have a stake in educating our children.

Now, there is a strong anti-public school wind blowing that puts individual interests first, advocating for a market-driven competitive system of education that promotes expanding charter schools and removing their oversight to a separate administrative unit and to privatization of education through promotion of tuition vouchers and tax credits.

The mantra for this movement is “parental choice” and promoting competition for enrollment of students, discounting the numerous choices within the flexible system.

Privatization reduces financial support for the traditional system by siphoning public dollars to pay for the private interests. Further, there is much accountability for student academic outcomes and for the financial expenditures in the traditional public system.

This may be lost in the privatization movement. There is little question that this movement will create a dual system: one committed to the public good and education to everyone who comes through the door, and the other to those who promote privatization and competition among our schools.

North Carolina and Guilford County have a strong legacy of public education committed to the common good. In the 21st century, when all need to achieve higher education, when only a high school diploma is inadequate, we must not be diverted by divided delivery structures; rather, we must recommit to the vision of high-quality public education for all of our children through one flexible system. Let us join together to strive for excellence for all schools and for all of our students.


Editor’s note: This editorial was originally published in the News & Record on April 14, 2013.